Jury selection just began for a lawsuit filed against Greenpeace in Morton County, North Dakota, kicking off a trial for a ...

This case and its outcome should be the concern of every American,” a legal expert says as the Dakota Access Pipeline trial ...

It is to silence public and academic speech. The tactic used against us is what is known as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). These suits are brought principally not to win in ...

In a closely watched case, the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline is claiming the environmental group masterminded protests ...

The $300 million lawsuit deals with protests against a pipeline route at a Missouri River crossing north of the Standing Rock ...

Critics call the lawsuit a clear example of a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP), designed to silence dissent and drain resources. "Big Oil is trying to send a message to us ...

The company behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline is suing Greenpeace for at least $300 million for damages the oil ...

This week marks the official kickoff of a long-brewing, high-stakes trial that could change the American environmental movement forever—and crush Americans’ First Amendment rights.

Anti-SLAPP laws provide defendants a way to quickly dismiss meritless lawsuits — known as SLAPPs or strategic lawsuits against public participation — filed against them for exercising speech, press, ...

French President Emmanuel Macron is set to present the European peace plan for Ukraine to President Trump today. And, ...