Previously, Garmin’s Forerunner lineup had memory-in-pixel displays. While MIP displays can be difficult to read in dimmer indoor lighting, they’re easier to read under direct sunlight and ...

As you can see from the results, the Garmin Forerunner 265 was pretty much spot on when it came to counting my steps, only over-estimating my step count by six steps. The Google Pixel Watch 2 ...

The Fenix 7 and Forerunner 965 are two of Garmin’s top ... and they come across much better on the OLED. It has 454 x 454 pixel display, compared to 260 x 260 pixels in the Fenix.

While that AMOLED inclusion does lead to a bigger battery drop from Garmin’s transflective memory-in-pixel display watches (such as the Forerunner 955), both can still muster up pleasing battery ...

Adding a new model to an existing range can be tricky, but that’s just what Garmin is trying to do with the Forerunner 165 ... apps you would on a Google Pixel Watch 2, but it’s not entirely ...

Garmin surprised us with a lovely new smartwatch in the form of the Forerunner 165 ... Many runners still prefer Memory in Pixel (MiP) displays over AMOLED, so this might not be a massive issue ...

But there are enough clues to paint a picture. The Forerunner 165 will reportedly come equipped with a 1.2-inch AMOLED (390 x 390 pixel resolution) display. This is significantly bigger than ...

In terms of its physical specs, the Forerunner 30 will weigh around 37g and bring you a 128 x 128 pixel display on its 23.5 x 23.4 mm MIP screen. Its overall size sits at 35.5 x 40.7 x 13.2 mm ...